ABSTRACT
Objective:To study the influence of the choice of main diagnosis on diagnosis-related groups(DRG) grouping and weight change, by taking cerebral infarction as the entry point.Methods:From January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019, 331 patients in three DRG groups(BR25, BR23, BR21) with cerebral infarction were selected. The original group was used as the control group; the main diagnosis was exchanged with the first other diagnosis, then DRG group was used as the experimental group. The difference of the number of cases and weight between the two groups was analyzed.Results:41.4%(137/331) of the patients in the experimental group were enrolled in BZ11 with other neurological disorders associated with important comorbidities and comorbidities, and 82.5%(273/331) patients′ weight increased after diagnostic conversion.Conclusions:Choosing other diagnosis as the main diagnosis may change the weight of the disease and affect the corresponding disease benefit. In order to prevent downcoding, DRG grouping should be detailed, and DRG payment should consider how to reflect the value of difficult cases; for upcoding behavior, medical insurance center and relevant medical institutions should check the correctness of coding, and monitor in place.
ABSTRACT
The authors described the purpose of the creation, the structure of the basic model, and the changes in the chapters of ICD-11, and analyzed its differences with ICD-10, as well as its unique advantages and current progress. The revision of ICD-11 is closely related to the development of modern medicine. It features more elaborate expression of diseases and informatization of classification tools, making it better fitting the development of medical and health information big data and facilitating the global collection and application of medical information data.